brute force

2026

in collaboration with Vinzenz Aubry

An interactive installation and performance questioning LLM-alienation and human-machine-control. Who controls whom?

brute force

The language of computers is full of violence. Programmers push updates, force merges, kill processes and execute commands. With the introduction of LLMs, these processes now reach directly into the hands of the consumer—burning trillions of tokens to “fix it”. Late-capitalist impatience and acceleration whips Amazon drivers towards their tight delivery windows and data through cables to gain an edge on finance markets.Working with LLMs introduces a strange new reality. The 10x engineer replaces three fired developers to then hit Enter on generated code that has not even been read—managing multiple shells and sessions, prompting and committing code all in parallel. Yet, there is a silent alienation creeping up from behind: while going full force, with cognitive tasks already irrelevant, we are reduced to watching the LLM do its work. And should it stop, a silent enter.When Xerxes whipped the Hellespont in 480 BC, or when artist Julius von Bismarck whipped a landscape two millennia later, the gesture was never about the object; it was a ritual of control, a way for humans not to feel enslaved by what they could not command. Today, we whip another entity without agency, our LLM-driven computer.

The Work

The installation consists of a computer running a local LLM tasked to build a random SaaS project. Visitors watch the fully automated system until it stops, asking to continue. There is no keyboard, no enter key, only a whip. Striking the computer with the whip will continue the generation. Once a service is built, it is published autonomously, added to a growing list of new software nobody asked for, and the system begins again. We find ourselves in an infinite cycle: software proliferating faster than anyone can question it, while humans perform the rituals that make them feel like they are still in control.Brute Force is indifferent to the software created. It reflects the collective compulsion to build faster, further, bigger without asking why. We find ourselves participants in an automated expansion that has already escaped us. Neither the programmer, nor the consumer, only the whip, and it only knows forward. The LLM is unleashed, the dead internet is real—control over our computers, the apparatus, was always just a ritual.